home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
032789
/
03278900.037
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-03-02
|
6KB
|
116 lines
<text id=89TT0837>
<link 93TO0076>
<title>
Mar. 27, 1989: Gunning For Assault Rifles
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
Armed America
Mar. 27, 1989 Is Anything Safe?
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
NATION, Page 39
Gunning for Assault Rifles
</hdr>
<body>
<p>An import ban will slow the boom in semiautomatic weapons
</p>
<p> Technology has a way of mocking history. When the framers
of the Constitution provided Americans with the right to bear
arms, they could hardly have imagined the development of
high-powered semiautomatic weapons capable of firing more than
30 rounds in a clip. The slaughter last January of five
Stockton, Calif., schoolchildren by a psychopath wielding an
imitation AK-47 assault rifle awakened the public to the danger
of these paramilitary weapons. Police have complained of being
outgunned by drug dealers with Uzis and AR-15s. Urban emergency
rooms have started resembling MASH units, with doctors treating
the sort of huge gunshot wounds once seen only in combat. The
Second Amendment notwithstanding, more and more Americans have
decided that something must be done to stem the nation's
internal arms race.
</p>
<p> Last week action came on three fronts. The Bush
Administration unexpectedly imposed a ban on the importation of
five different types of semi-automatic rifles, pending a review
to determine whether the guns have a real sporting purpose or
are used primarily to kill people. The next day Colt Industries
suspended commercial sales of the AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, the
civilian copy of the military's M-16. In California the
80-member state assembly voted by a narrow margin (41 to 38) to
outlaw the manufacture and sale of semiautomatic weapons, a move
that could inspire two dozen other state legislatures
considering similar bans. It was a stunning triple play that
exhilarated gun-control activists and left the mighty gun lobby
fuming.
</p>
<p> Just a month ago George Bush, a life member of the National
Rifle Association, told reporters he was "not about to" impose
a ban on semiautomatic weapons. But even as he made that claim,
the President was searching for ways to cope with the surge in
semiautomatic sales. Advisers from Barbara Bush to Los Angeles
Police Chief Daryl Gates pleaded with the President to outlaw
the guns. For several weeks Bush had discussed the
semiautomatic-weapons dilemma with his friend Senator James
McClure, an Idaho Republican and staunch gun-rights defender.
The President was torn between wanting to protect the rights of
sportsmen and the lives of police officers.
</p>
<p> The ban on imports offered a solution. Stephen Higgins,
director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, had
been alarmed by the increase in foreign imports of
semiautomatics: from only 4,000 in 1986, requests jumped to
40,000 in 1987, to 44,000 in 1988. In just the first three
months of this year, there were 113,732 requests from foreign
importers to bring the weapons into the U.S. Two weeks ago,
Higgins supplied William Bennett, the Administration's
designated director of national drug policy, with the startling
statistics.
</p>
<p> On Tuesday, one day after he was sworn in as "drug czar,"
Bennett talked the import ban over with Treasury Secretary
Nicholas Brady, whose department oversees the BATF. Bennett got
word to White House chief of staff John Sununu about the plan.
When the White House did not object, Bennett and Higgins went
ahead and announced the import ban last Tuesday.
</p>
<p> The restriction on gun importers will merely dent the
semiautomatic market: roughly two-thirds of the estimated
500,000 privately owned assault-style weapons in the U.S. are
made by American manufacturers. Bennett called Colt's decision
to stop making AR-15s "an act of civic responsibility." But Colt
could afford to be responsible: the company is now a
multi-industrial conglomerate, with guns accounting for only
some 5% of its $1.6 billion in annual sales. It is unlikely that
other gun manufacturers will rush to follow suit.
</p>
<p> Gun shops around the country last week were inundated by
shoppers eager to grab weapons that may soon be collectors'
items. At Sacramento's Wild Sports Enterprises, one of Northern
California's largest gun dealers, the price of an AK-47 has
increased from $300 to as much as $1,000 a copy. "These guns
are coming in and going out 30 a day," exults Wild Sports owner
Sterling Fligge. "I used to sell one a week. They're buying
them all, everything and anything they can get their hands on."
</p>
<p> The N.R.A. was uncharacteristically quiet about last week's
events. Legislative director Wayne LaPierre expressed hope that
the import ban would "put a stop to the media hysteria"
surrounding semiautomatic weapons. Gun-control advocates hope
that the horror wrought by semiautomatic weapons will unite the
general public into a force strong enough to overcome even the
gun lobby. A CBS News poll last week found that 73% of Americans
favored a nationwide ban on semiautomatic weapons. "The N.R.A.
can be defeated," said Luis Tolley, director of the California
Office of Handgun Control Inc. "They are supposed to be this big
tiger, but where are their teeth, where are their claws?" He may
discover that tigers are most ferocious when they are wounded.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>